United States · Individuals

QSBS Conformity by State: Which States Follow Section 1202

Most states with an income tax follow the federal QSBS exclusion because they start from federal income. California and Pennsylvania tax the gain in full. Oregon, Illinois and Vermont add it back for 2026; Maine adds it back for newer stock and Rhode Island from 2027. The state where you live when you sell generally decides.

Di Lu, CPA
Di Lu, CPAUS and Canadian CPA

Have a question about your situation?

Free · 10 minutes · Phone call

English & Chinese

Book a callChoose a time that works for you

Tax year 2026 · Last updated  · Published by Cloud Accounting under standing professional approval

Who this is for

  • Founders, employees and investors checking whether their state taxes a gain the federal return excludes
  • Holders of startup shares who may move, or be paid over several years, before a sale

Not covered here

  • Whether the shares qualify for the federal exclusion
  • California rates, estimated tax and Schedule D (540) lines
  • Residency tests, option and RSU sourcing, and the move-year return
  • Shares held through a trust, partnership or fund

Does my state follow the federal QSBS exclusion?

Most states with an income tax do. They start from federal income, so gain excluded under section 1202 stays out unless the state's own law adds it back. A short list of states departs, and that list is changing for sales in 2026 and later. The table gives each state's status for a sale in 2026, taken from that state's own statute, bulletin or instructions.

Status for a 2026 saleStates
Taxes the gain in fullCalifornia, Pennsylvania
Adds the gain back for 2026Oregon, Illinois, Vermont
Adds back stock first acquired after July 3, 2025Maine
Follows for 2026, adds back from 2027Rhode Island
Follows only in part (own or frozen version)Arkansas, Hawaii, Massachusetts, South Carolina
FollowsArizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin
Not confirmedAlabama, District of Columbia, Mississippi, New Hampshire
No tax on individual income, so no state QSBS ruleAlaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming
No income tax; a separate capital gains tax does not reach excluded gainWashington

No official 50-state list exists, so each row rests on that state's own pages. "Follows" means the state's modification lists contain no section 1202 add-back, and the state ties to the federal code as the tables below show.

What makes a case harder than a lookup:

  • You moved, or plan to. The state where you live when you sell generally decides, so a move changes which row applies.
  • Payments arrive over several years. Escrow, holdback and earnout money may be taxed in a later year under that year's state rule.
  • The state is changing its law. Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Rhode Island, Maine and New Jersey have changed their rules recently, a bill is in committee in New York, and Maryland's 2026 bill did not advance.

Gather your residence history with dates, each lot's acquisition date and cost, the expected sale date, and the deal documents.

Which states do not conform to QSBS, or only in part?

Eleven states differ from the federal exclusion for a 2026 sale or soon after. Two tax the gain in full, four add it back for 2026 or for newer stock, Rhode Island adds it back from 2027, and four follow a frozen or own version.

StateWhat it doesSource
CaliforniaDoes not conform to the section 1045 and 1202 deferral and exclusion; the entire gain is entered and taxedSchedule D (540) instructions
PennsylvaniaMakes no provision for capital gains and taxes gain on stock; its guide lists no QSBS exclusionPA income tax guide
OregonAdds back gain excluded under section 1202, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026SB 1507, sections 5 and 10
IllinoisAdds back gain excluded under section 1202, for tax years ending on and after December 31, 2026Public Act 104-0468
VermontAdds back all gain excluded under section 1202(a), for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 202632 V.S.A. section 5811
MaineAdds back gain excluded under section 1202(a)(1) for stock first acquired after July 3, 2025; no add-back for older stock in the list36 M.R.S. section 5122
Rhode IslandFollows for 2026; decouples from section 1202 for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027Division of Taxation summary
ArkansasAdopts section 1202 "as in effect on January 1, 1995", so later federal changes do not carry in26 CAR 100-153
HawaiiApplies section 1202 as it stood at the end of 2024, without paragraphs (a)(3) and (4); generally 50% of the gain is excludedHB 2329 CD1, section 4
MassachusettsFollows section 1202 as it stood on January 1, 2024: a 100% exclusion after a 5-year hold, without the 2025 tiers; also a 3% rate on gain from stock of certain Massachusetts-domiciled companies held 3 years or more, including S corporation stock the exclusion does not reach2026 Tax Expenditure Review Commission report, M.G.L. c. 62, section 1, M.G.L. c. 62, section 4
South CarolinaTies to the federal code as amended through December 31, 2024, so the 2025 changes are not adoptedS.C. Code 12-6-40

Notes on the harder rows:

  • Oregon. The Department of Revenue lists SB 1507 as Oregon Laws 2026, chapter 142, and notes that a referendum petition against it was filed in April. The Secretary of State's page for the November 3, 2026 general election says no statewide ballot measures are on the ballot, but neither page states what became of the petition. Confirm the law's status before you rely on it.
  • Massachusetts. The statute defines the federal code as amended on January 1, 2024, and the Commission's report says that means a 5-year hold, a 100% exclusion and none of the 2025 changes. The state's budget pages disagree with each other and with the statute on the code year and the share (the older item 1.042 uses the 2005 code), so do not rely on them. The reduced rate applies only to stock of a corporation domiciled in Massachusetts. Treat Massachusetts as a case for professional review.
  • South Carolina. The department's information letter says the state has not considered the 2025 federal changes (IL 26-4). A bill to update the date, H. 3368, failed in the Senate on March 31, 2026. For a 2026 sale this generally changes nothing, because stock acquired after July 4, 2025 cannot reach the federal tiers before mid-2028; the example below shows newer stock.
  • Rhode Island. The 2027 add-back is in the Division of Taxation's summary, which lists the budget act (House Bill 7127 Substitute A, as amended) as enacted and effective June 12, 2026.

States not confirmed

A state is "not confirmed" when its own pages did not settle the rule. Do not assume either way.

StateWhat its own pages showSource
AlabamaIts revenue department lists the 2025 expansion as not tied to federal law; the summary does not say how Alabama treats the older exclusion, and Alabama's individual tax does not start from federal law generallyAlabama summary
District of ColumbiaIts tax office booklet says the District will not recognize the exclusion; Congress disapproved the Council's temporary add-back act, and the current emergency act reaches only 2025 sales and says nothing for 2026OTR D-40 booklet, D.C. Act 26-416, Public Law 119-78
MississippiNo page mentions section 1202; Mississippi computes gain under its own statute and tells filers to attach a reconciliation when its gain differs from the federal figureForm 80-100 instructions
New HampshireIts interest and dividends tax is repealed from January 1, 2025; no revenue department page confirms that no other tax reaches an individual's stock gainRSA chapter 77

Which states clearly follow the QSBS exclusion?

Twenty-eight states follow it for a 2026 sale. Each starts from federal income, and its additions to federal income list no section 1202 item. The tie column shows how the state follows the federal code: a rolling tie picks up federal changes automatically, and a fixed tie stops at a date.

StateTie to the federal codeSource
ArizonaFixed: code in effect January 1, 2026A.R.S. 43-105
ColoradoRolling; the State Auditor says Colorado allows the full QSBS exclusionAuditor report 2026-TE5
ConnecticutRolling ("as from time to time amended")Chapter 229
DelawareRolling30 Del. C. chapter 11
GeorgiaFixed: federal law enacted on or before January 1, 2026, retroactive to the 2025 tax yearH.B. 1199
IdahoFixed: January 1, 2026Idaho Code 63-3004
IndianaFixed: January 1, 2026Indiana Code title 6
IowaRollingIowa conformity page
KansasRollingK.S.A. 79-32,109
KentuckyFixed: December 31, 2025KRS 141.010
LouisianaStarts from adjusted gross income reportable on the federal returnR.S. 47:293
MarylandRolling; a 2026 bill to add the gain back has not advancedTax-General 1-101, H.B. 801 fiscal note
MichiganFixed at January 1, 2025, or at the taxpayer's option the code in effect for the tax yearMCL 206.12
MinnesotaFixed: May 1, 20262026 Laws chapter 128
MissouriRolling; also subtracts all capital gain reported federally, from tax year 2025RSMo 143.121
MontanaRollingMCA 15-30-2101
NebraskaRollingNeb. Rev. Stat. 77-2714
New JerseyExcludes gain exempt federally, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026P.L. 2025, c.67
New MexicoRollingHB 93, section 7-2-2
New YorkStarts from federal adjusted gross income; a bill to add the gain back is in committeeTax Law 612, S8921A
North CarolinaFixed: July 5, 2025S.L. 2026-31
North DakotaRollingN.D.C.C. chapter 57-38
OhioFixed: March 5, 2026R.C. 5701.11
OklahomaRolling68 O.S. 2353
UtahRollingUtah Code 59-10-103
VirginiaFixed: December 31, 2025Va. Code 58.1-301
West VirginiaAmendments through December 31, 2025 take effect; later ones do notW. Va. Code 11-21-9
WisconsinSection 1202 as in effect for federal purposes, for tax years beginning after 2018Wis. Stat. 71.98

In New York, a large exclusion is worth a check against the minimum income tax: its instructions (posted edition dated 2013) list stock gain excluded under section 1202 as a tax preference item (Form IT-220 instructions). Georgia's 2025 booklet said the state had not adopted the 2025 federal law; H.B. 1199 later made its tie retroactive.

What does "conform" mean: current code, a fixed date, or the state's own rule?

A state conforms in one of three ways, and the way decides what happens when federal law changes.

WayWhat it meansExamples from the tables
RollingThe state uses the federal code as it is amended, so federal changes flow in unless the state blocks themColorado, Iowa, Maryland, Utah, Wisconsin
Fixed dateThe state uses the federal code as of a stated date and needs a new law to pick up later changesArizona (January 1, 2026), Ohio (March 5, 2026), South Carolina (December 31, 2024)
Own rule or add-backThe state follows or decouples from section 1202 by name, whatever its general tieArkansas, Hawaii, Maine, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont

A state's general tie does not settle section 1202 on its own. Rhode Island is rolling in general but decouples from section 1202 by name from 2027, and Hawaii updated its general tie but kept section 1202 as it stood at the end of 2024.

Why does a fixed-date state matter for the 2025 federal changes?

It matters when the state's date comes before July 4, 2025, because the state then has not adopted the larger federal exclusion. The 2025 federal law changed the exclusion for stock acquired after July 4, 2025, and added tiers that start at 3 years of holding (Public Law 119-21, section 70431). Stock acquired after that date cannot reach the new tiers before July 2028.

States tied to a date before July 4, 2025 in the tables above are South Carolina (December 31, 2024), Hawaii (section 1202 as of December 31, 2024), Massachusetts (January 1, 2024), Arkansas (January 1, 1995) and, by default, Michigan (January 1, 2025, with the option to use the current code). The other fixed-date states in the tables use a date after July 4, 2025. For a 2026 sale of older stock, the question is whether the state follows section 1202 at all; for stock bought now and sold from mid-2028, the question is whether the state will have updated its date by then. See QSBS for founders and early employees for the federal tiers.

Does the state where the company is based or incorporated matter?

Generally no. Gain from selling stock is sourced to where you live when you sell, not to where the company is based or incorporated. California's residency guide says the gain "has a source where you are a resident at the time of the sale", and gives an Oregon resident selling stock of a California corporation as an example of a gain California does not tax (FTB Publication 1031).

A few state rules do look at the company. Massachusetts' reduced rate applies only to stock of a corporation domiciled in Massachusetts (M.G.L. c. 62, section 4). Rules for options and for stock held in a business can differ; they belong to the moving guide below.

If I move before a sale, which state's rule applies?

The rule of the state where you are a resident when you sell generally applies, so moving from a state that taxes the gain to one that does not can change the result. California says a resident is taxed on all income, whatever its source (FTB Publication 1031).

Whether you have really moved is a question of facts and dates, not a change of mailing address, and a part-year move creates two returns. Residency tests, option and RSU sourcing, and the move-year return are in moving to another state before selling startup shares. If a sale and a move fall in the same year, the order matters enough to review before you sign.

A state with no income tax: is the QSBS gain tax-free there?

These states do not tax the gain as individual income, according to each state's own source below. Washington has separate taxes to check.

StateWhat its own source saysSource
AlaskaNo individual income taxDepartment of Revenue
FloridaNo personal income taxDepartment of Revenue FAQ
NevadaNo state tax on individual incomeDepartment of Taxation
South DakotaNo state income taxDepartment of Revenue
TennesseeHall income tax on interest and dividends repealed for periods beginning January 1, 2021 or laterHall income tax page
TexasConstitution bars a tax on individuals' net income and on capital gains of individualsArticle VIII, sections 24-a and 24-b
WyomingIndividual income tax rate of zeroLegislature tax structure report
WashingtonNo gain tax on QSBS gain excluded federally under section 1202; a new tax of 9.9% on adjusted gross income over $1,000,000 starts January 1, 2028, with calculation rules not yet publishedCapital gains FAQ, Income tax FAQ

A move to one of these states does not by itself end your old state's tax on income earned there or on a sale made before the move. Other taxes these states charge, and what a move does and does not end, are in states with no income tax: what an owner still pays.

What if the sale pays over several years, such as escrow or an earnout?

A payment received in a later year is generally tested under the state's rule for that year, so a start date in the tables can change the answer for the later payment. Rhode Island's add-back begins with tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, Illinois's with tax years ending on and after December 31, 2026, and New Jersey's exclusion with tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.

Where you live when each payment is taxed can matter too, which is why a move between payments needs review. How escrow, holdback and earnout payments are taxed federally is in escrow and holdback payments and earnout payments.

How do I report the state difference on my return?

A state that does not follow the exclusion has you add the excluded gain to your federal income on its own form. Oregon, Illinois and Vermont write the add-back into their statutes as an addition to federal income. California has you enter the entire gain on Schedule D (540) and carry the difference to Schedule CA (540) (Schedule D (540) instructions); the lines are in state tax on QSBS gains.

A state that follows the exclusion needs no entry beyond your federal figures. Keep the federal Form 8949 and Schedule D detail with the state return, because a state addition starts from the amount you excluded. How to claim the federal exclusion is in the QSBS guide.

How do I confirm my state's rule for the year of the sale?

Check the state's own pages for the tax year of each payment, not last year's booklet. Several of the rules above changed in 2026, and booklets printed earlier can say the opposite.

  1. Find the state's list of additions and subtractions to federal income for that year, and search it for section 1202 or small business stock.
  2. Find how the state ties to the federal code: rolling, or a fixed date, and which date.
  3. Look for a conformity or federal-changes notice from the state tax agency for the year.
  4. Search the state legislature's site for bills that add back or restore the exclusion. New York S8921A and Maryland H.B. 801 are examples that had not become law when checked.
  5. Re-check just before the sale and again at filing; a bill passed after the sale can still apply to the tax year.

If your state shows in the "not confirmed" or "follows only in part" rows, or you hold stock in more than one state's name, the answer needs a professional read of the current statute.

Example

These examples are illustrative, in US dollars, and assume the shares qualify for the federal exclusion.

Founder in Wisconsin sells older shares

A Wisconsin resident sells founder shares for a $2,000,000 gain, all excluded on the federal return. Wisconsin applies section 1202 as in effect for federal purposes, so there is no Wisconsin add-back and the $2,000,000 stays out of Wisconsin income. The founder still checks the current Wisconsin instructions for the sale year.

Rhode Island resident paid over two years

A Rhode Island resident sells shares in December 2026 for a $1,000,000 gain, with $600,000 paid at closing and $400,000 released from escrow the next year. Rhode Island follows the exclusion for the first year, so the $600,000 is excluded. If the second payment is reported in a tax year beginning on or after January 1, 2027, Rhode Island adds back the amount excluded on it. The resident confirms the Rhode Island rule for that later year before relying on the exclusion.

Buyer of new shares in a fixed-date state

A founder in South Carolina buys newly issued shares now and sells them after four years for a $1,500,000 gain. Federally, the 4-year tier excludes 75%, or $1,125,000. South Carolina follows the code as amended through December 31, 2024, which excludes gain only on stock held more than 5 years. Unless South Carolina updates its date by the sale year, none of the $1,500,000 may be excluded there, so the founder checks the state's date for that year.

Different for you?

Figures on this page

FigureValueSource
Hawaii share of qualified small business stock gain generally excluded
HRS 235-2.45(e), as amended by Act 35 (2026) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, makes IRC 1202 operative in its form as of December 31, 2024, except 1202(a)(3) and (a)(4), leaving the base percentage in 1202(a)(1); empowerment-zone stock may differ
50%
Tax year 2026
Hawaii Legislature: HB 2329 CD1 (2026), enacted as Act 35
Checked
Massachusetts income exclusion for qualified small business stock gain (stock held more than 5 years)
Massachusetts follows section 1202 as the code stood on January 1, 2024 (M.G.L. c. 62, section 1(c)): a 5-year hold, no 2025 tiers. The state's budget pages give older conformity years and a 50% share, which the Commission report does not support
100%Massachusetts Tax Expenditure Review Commission: 2026 report
Checked
Massachusetts reduced rate on certain small business stock gain
Part C income from stock of a Massachusetts-domiciled corporation meeting the asset, qualification and 3-year holding conditions of M.G.L. c. 62, section 4(c); the Commission report says it reaches S corporation stock the federal exclusion does not
3%Massachusetts General Laws chapter 62, section 4
Checked
Washington new individual income tax rate
Applies from January 1, 2028 to individuals and married couples filing jointly with annual adjusted gross income over the threshold (Senate Bill 6346)
9.9%
Tax year 2028
Washington Department of Revenue: Income tax FAQ
Checked
Washington new individual income tax adjusted gross income threshold
Annual adjusted gross income exceeding this amount; the department says how income is calculated will be published later
$1,000,000
Tax year 2028
Washington Department of Revenue: Income tax FAQ
Checked
Washington new income tax start date
First return due the following year
January 1, 2028Washington Department of Revenue: Income tax
Checked

Primary sources

About this guide

Published by Cloud Accounting under standing professional approval. This version has no separately recorded personal review. It explains general rules for the tax year shown. It is not advice for your situation.

Changes

  • : First published.
Di Lu, CPA
Di Lu, CPAUS and Canadian CPA

Ready to talk through your next step?

Free · 10 minutes · Phone call

English & Chinese

A first call to discuss your needs and how we can help.

Book a callChoose a time that works for you

Book a consultation

Free · 10 minutes

By booking, you agree to our privacy policy. If an ad brought you here, we tell that ad platform when you book, and may tell it when you spend time on a page, tap our phone number or pick a time. We never share your name, email or phone. Privacy policy

Calendar not loading? Book a consultation