Who this is for
- Founders, employees and investors checking whether their state taxes a gain the federal return excludes
- Holders of startup shares who may move, or be paid over several years, before a sale
Not covered here
- Whether the shares qualify for the federal exclusion
- California rates, estimated tax and Schedule D (540) lines
- Residency tests, option and RSU sourcing, and the move-year return
- Shares held through a trust, partnership or fund
Does my state follow the federal QSBS exclusion?
Most states with an income tax do. They start from federal income, so gain excluded under section 1202 stays out unless the state's own law adds it back. A short list of states departs, and that list is changing for sales in 2026 and later. The table gives each state's status for a sale in 2026, taken from that state's own statute, bulletin or instructions.
| Status for a 2026 sale | States |
|---|---|
| Taxes the gain in full | California, Pennsylvania |
| Adds the gain back for 2026 | Oregon, Illinois, Vermont |
| Adds back stock first acquired after July 3, 2025 | Maine |
| Follows for 2026, adds back from 2027 | Rhode Island |
| Follows only in part (own or frozen version) | Arkansas, Hawaii, Massachusetts, South Carolina |
| Follows | Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin |
| Not confirmed | Alabama, District of Columbia, Mississippi, New Hampshire |
| No tax on individual income, so no state QSBS rule | Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming |
| No income tax; a separate capital gains tax does not reach excluded gain | Washington |
No official 50-state list exists, so each row rests on that state's own pages. "Follows" means the state's modification lists contain no section 1202 add-back, and the state ties to the federal code as the tables below show.
What makes a case harder than a lookup:
- You moved, or plan to. The state where you live when you sell generally decides, so a move changes which row applies.
- Payments arrive over several years. Escrow, holdback and earnout money may be taxed in a later year under that year's state rule.
- The state is changing its law. Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, Rhode Island, Maine and New Jersey have changed their rules recently, a bill is in committee in New York, and Maryland's 2026 bill did not advance.
Gather your residence history with dates, each lot's acquisition date and cost, the expected sale date, and the deal documents.
Which states do not conform to QSBS, or only in part?
Eleven states differ from the federal exclusion for a 2026 sale or soon after. Two tax the gain in full, four add it back for 2026 or for newer stock, Rhode Island adds it back from 2027, and four follow a frozen or own version.
| State | What it does | Source |
|---|---|---|
| California | Does not conform to the section 1045 and 1202 deferral and exclusion; the entire gain is entered and taxed | Schedule D (540) instructions |
| Pennsylvania | Makes no provision for capital gains and taxes gain on stock; its guide lists no QSBS exclusion | PA income tax guide |
| Oregon | Adds back gain excluded under section 1202, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026 | SB 1507, sections 5 and 10 |
| Illinois | Adds back gain excluded under section 1202, for tax years ending on and after December 31, 2026 | Public Act 104-0468 |
| Vermont | Adds back all gain excluded under section 1202(a), for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026 | 32 V.S.A. section 5811 |
| Maine | Adds back gain excluded under section 1202(a)(1) for stock first acquired after July 3, 2025; no add-back for older stock in the list | 36 M.R.S. section 5122 |
| Rhode Island | Follows for 2026; decouples from section 1202 for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027 | Division of Taxation summary |
| Arkansas | Adopts section 1202 "as in effect on January 1, 1995", so later federal changes do not carry in | 26 CAR 100-153 |
| Hawaii | Applies section 1202 as it stood at the end of 2024, without paragraphs (a)(3) and (4); generally 50% of the gain is excluded | HB 2329 CD1, section 4 |
| Massachusetts | Follows section 1202 as it stood on January 1, 2024: a 100% exclusion after a 5-year hold, without the 2025 tiers; also a 3% rate on gain from stock of certain Massachusetts-domiciled companies held 3 years or more, including S corporation stock the exclusion does not reach | 2026 Tax Expenditure Review Commission report, M.G.L. c. 62, section 1, M.G.L. c. 62, section 4 |
| South Carolina | Ties to the federal code as amended through December 31, 2024, so the 2025 changes are not adopted | S.C. Code 12-6-40 |
Notes on the harder rows:
- Oregon. The Department of Revenue lists SB 1507 as Oregon Laws 2026, chapter 142, and notes that a referendum petition against it was filed in April. The Secretary of State's page for the November 3, 2026 general election says no statewide ballot measures are on the ballot, but neither page states what became of the petition. Confirm the law's status before you rely on it.
- Massachusetts. The statute defines the federal code as amended on January 1, 2024, and the Commission's report says that means a 5-year hold, a 100% exclusion and none of the 2025 changes. The state's budget pages disagree with each other and with the statute on the code year and the share (the older item 1.042 uses the 2005 code), so do not rely on them. The reduced rate applies only to stock of a corporation domiciled in Massachusetts. Treat Massachusetts as a case for professional review.
- South Carolina. The department's information letter says the state has not considered the 2025 federal changes (IL 26-4). A bill to update the date, H. 3368, failed in the Senate on March 31, 2026. For a 2026 sale this generally changes nothing, because stock acquired after July 4, 2025 cannot reach the federal tiers before mid-2028; the example below shows newer stock.
- Rhode Island. The 2027 add-back is in the Division of Taxation's summary, which lists the budget act (House Bill 7127 Substitute A, as amended) as enacted and effective June 12, 2026.
States not confirmed
A state is "not confirmed" when its own pages did not settle the rule. Do not assume either way.
| State | What its own pages show | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Its revenue department lists the 2025 expansion as not tied to federal law; the summary does not say how Alabama treats the older exclusion, and Alabama's individual tax does not start from federal law generally | Alabama summary |
| District of Columbia | Its tax office booklet says the District will not recognize the exclusion; Congress disapproved the Council's temporary add-back act, and the current emergency act reaches only 2025 sales and says nothing for 2026 | OTR D-40 booklet, D.C. Act 26-416, Public Law 119-78 |
| Mississippi | No page mentions section 1202; Mississippi computes gain under its own statute and tells filers to attach a reconciliation when its gain differs from the federal figure | Form 80-100 instructions |
| New Hampshire | Its interest and dividends tax is repealed from January 1, 2025; no revenue department page confirms that no other tax reaches an individual's stock gain | RSA chapter 77 |
Which states clearly follow the QSBS exclusion?
Twenty-eight states follow it for a 2026 sale. Each starts from federal income, and its additions to federal income list no section 1202 item. The tie column shows how the state follows the federal code: a rolling tie picks up federal changes automatically, and a fixed tie stops at a date.
| State | Tie to the federal code | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona | Fixed: code in effect January 1, 2026 | A.R.S. 43-105 |
| Colorado | Rolling; the State Auditor says Colorado allows the full QSBS exclusion | Auditor report 2026-TE5 |
| Connecticut | Rolling ("as from time to time amended") | Chapter 229 |
| Delaware | Rolling | 30 Del. C. chapter 11 |
| Georgia | Fixed: federal law enacted on or before January 1, 2026, retroactive to the 2025 tax year | H.B. 1199 |
| Idaho | Fixed: January 1, 2026 | Idaho Code 63-3004 |
| Indiana | Fixed: January 1, 2026 | Indiana Code title 6 |
| Iowa | Rolling | Iowa conformity page |
| Kansas | Rolling | K.S.A. 79-32,109 |
| Kentucky | Fixed: December 31, 2025 | KRS 141.010 |
| Louisiana | Starts from adjusted gross income reportable on the federal return | R.S. 47:293 |
| Maryland | Rolling; a 2026 bill to add the gain back has not advanced | Tax-General 1-101, H.B. 801 fiscal note |
| Michigan | Fixed at January 1, 2025, or at the taxpayer's option the code in effect for the tax year | MCL 206.12 |
| Minnesota | Fixed: May 1, 2026 | 2026 Laws chapter 128 |
| Missouri | Rolling; also subtracts all capital gain reported federally, from tax year 2025 | RSMo 143.121 |
| Montana | Rolling | MCA 15-30-2101 |
| Nebraska | Rolling | Neb. Rev. Stat. 77-2714 |
| New Jersey | Excludes gain exempt federally, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026 | P.L. 2025, c.67 |
| New Mexico | Rolling | HB 93, section 7-2-2 |
| New York | Starts from federal adjusted gross income; a bill to add the gain back is in committee | Tax Law 612, S8921A |
| North Carolina | Fixed: July 5, 2025 | S.L. 2026-31 |
| North Dakota | Rolling | N.D.C.C. chapter 57-38 |
| Ohio | Fixed: March 5, 2026 | R.C. 5701.11 |
| Oklahoma | Rolling | 68 O.S. 2353 |
| Utah | Rolling | Utah Code 59-10-103 |
| Virginia | Fixed: December 31, 2025 | Va. Code 58.1-301 |
| West Virginia | Amendments through December 31, 2025 take effect; later ones do not | W. Va. Code 11-21-9 |
| Wisconsin | Section 1202 as in effect for federal purposes, for tax years beginning after 2018 | Wis. Stat. 71.98 |
In New York, a large exclusion is worth a check against the minimum income tax: its instructions (posted edition dated 2013) list stock gain excluded under section 1202 as a tax preference item (Form IT-220 instructions). Georgia's 2025 booklet said the state had not adopted the 2025 federal law; H.B. 1199 later made its tie retroactive.
What does "conform" mean: current code, a fixed date, or the state's own rule?
A state conforms in one of three ways, and the way decides what happens when federal law changes.
| Way | What it means | Examples from the tables |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling | The state uses the federal code as it is amended, so federal changes flow in unless the state blocks them | Colorado, Iowa, Maryland, Utah, Wisconsin |
| Fixed date | The state uses the federal code as of a stated date and needs a new law to pick up later changes | Arizona (January 1, 2026), Ohio (March 5, 2026), South Carolina (December 31, 2024) |
| Own rule or add-back | The state follows or decouples from section 1202 by name, whatever its general tie | Arkansas, Hawaii, Maine, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont |
A state's general tie does not settle section 1202 on its own. Rhode Island is rolling in general but decouples from section 1202 by name from 2027, and Hawaii updated its general tie but kept section 1202 as it stood at the end of 2024.
Why does a fixed-date state matter for the 2025 federal changes?
It matters when the state's date comes before July 4, 2025, because the state then has not adopted the larger federal exclusion. The 2025 federal law changed the exclusion for stock acquired after July 4, 2025, and added tiers that start at 3 years of holding (Public Law 119-21, section 70431). Stock acquired after that date cannot reach the new tiers before July 2028.
States tied to a date before July 4, 2025 in the tables above are South Carolina (December 31, 2024), Hawaii (section 1202 as of December 31, 2024), Massachusetts (January 1, 2024), Arkansas (January 1, 1995) and, by default, Michigan (January 1, 2025, with the option to use the current code). The other fixed-date states in the tables use a date after July 4, 2025. For a 2026 sale of older stock, the question is whether the state follows section 1202 at all; for stock bought now and sold from mid-2028, the question is whether the state will have updated its date by then. See QSBS for founders and early employees for the federal tiers.
Does the state where the company is based or incorporated matter?
Generally no. Gain from selling stock is sourced to where you live when you sell, not to where the company is based or incorporated. California's residency guide says the gain "has a source where you are a resident at the time of the sale", and gives an Oregon resident selling stock of a California corporation as an example of a gain California does not tax (FTB Publication 1031).
A few state rules do look at the company. Massachusetts' reduced rate applies only to stock of a corporation domiciled in Massachusetts (M.G.L. c. 62, section 4). Rules for options and for stock held in a business can differ; they belong to the moving guide below.
If I move before a sale, which state's rule applies?
The rule of the state where you are a resident when you sell generally applies, so moving from a state that taxes the gain to one that does not can change the result. California says a resident is taxed on all income, whatever its source (FTB Publication 1031).
Whether you have really moved is a question of facts and dates, not a change of mailing address, and a part-year move creates two returns. Residency tests, option and RSU sourcing, and the move-year return are in moving to another state before selling startup shares. If a sale and a move fall in the same year, the order matters enough to review before you sign.
A state with no income tax: is the QSBS gain tax-free there?
These states do not tax the gain as individual income, according to each state's own source below. Washington has separate taxes to check.
| State | What its own source says | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska | No individual income tax | Department of Revenue |
| Florida | No personal income tax | Department of Revenue FAQ |
| Nevada | No state tax on individual income | Department of Taxation |
| South Dakota | No state income tax | Department of Revenue |
| Tennessee | Hall income tax on interest and dividends repealed for periods beginning January 1, 2021 or later | Hall income tax page |
| Texas | Constitution bars a tax on individuals' net income and on capital gains of individuals | Article VIII, sections 24-a and 24-b |
| Wyoming | Individual income tax rate of zero | Legislature tax structure report |
| Washington | No gain tax on QSBS gain excluded federally under section 1202; a new tax of 9.9% on adjusted gross income over $1,000,000 starts January 1, 2028, with calculation rules not yet published | Capital gains FAQ, Income tax FAQ |
A move to one of these states does not by itself end your old state's tax on income earned there or on a sale made before the move. Other taxes these states charge, and what a move does and does not end, are in states with no income tax: what an owner still pays.
What if the sale pays over several years, such as escrow or an earnout?
A payment received in a later year is generally tested under the state's rule for that year, so a start date in the tables can change the answer for the later payment. Rhode Island's add-back begins with tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, Illinois's with tax years ending on and after December 31, 2026, and New Jersey's exclusion with tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.
Where you live when each payment is taxed can matter too, which is why a move between payments needs review. How escrow, holdback and earnout payments are taxed federally is in escrow and holdback payments and earnout payments.
How do I report the state difference on my return?
A state that does not follow the exclusion has you add the excluded gain to your federal income on its own form. Oregon, Illinois and Vermont write the add-back into their statutes as an addition to federal income. California has you enter the entire gain on Schedule D (540) and carry the difference to Schedule CA (540) (Schedule D (540) instructions); the lines are in state tax on QSBS gains.
A state that follows the exclusion needs no entry beyond your federal figures. Keep the federal Form 8949 and Schedule D detail with the state return, because a state addition starts from the amount you excluded. How to claim the federal exclusion is in the QSBS guide.
How do I confirm my state's rule for the year of the sale?
Check the state's own pages for the tax year of each payment, not last year's booklet. Several of the rules above changed in 2026, and booklets printed earlier can say the opposite.
- Find the state's list of additions and subtractions to federal income for that year, and search it for section 1202 or small business stock.
- Find how the state ties to the federal code: rolling, or a fixed date, and which date.
- Look for a conformity or federal-changes notice from the state tax agency for the year.
- Search the state legislature's site for bills that add back or restore the exclusion. New York S8921A and Maryland H.B. 801 are examples that had not become law when checked.
- Re-check just before the sale and again at filing; a bill passed after the sale can still apply to the tax year.
If your state shows in the "not confirmed" or "follows only in part" rows, or you hold stock in more than one state's name, the answer needs a professional read of the current statute.
Example
These examples are illustrative, in US dollars, and assume the shares qualify for the federal exclusion.
Founder in Wisconsin sells older shares
A Wisconsin resident sells founder shares for a $2,000,000 gain, all excluded on the federal return. Wisconsin applies section 1202 as in effect for federal purposes, so there is no Wisconsin add-back and the $2,000,000 stays out of Wisconsin income. The founder still checks the current Wisconsin instructions for the sale year.
Rhode Island resident paid over two years
A Rhode Island resident sells shares in December 2026 for a $1,000,000 gain, with $600,000 paid at closing and $400,000 released from escrow the next year. Rhode Island follows the exclusion for the first year, so the $600,000 is excluded. If the second payment is reported in a tax year beginning on or after January 1, 2027, Rhode Island adds back the amount excluded on it. The resident confirms the Rhode Island rule for that later year before relying on the exclusion.
Buyer of new shares in a fixed-date state
A founder in South Carolina buys newly issued shares now and sells them after four years for a $1,500,000 gain. Federally, the 4-year tier excludes 75%, or $1,125,000. South Carolina follows the code as amended through December 31, 2024, which excludes gain only on stock held more than 5 years. Unless South Carolina updates its date by the sale year, none of the $1,500,000 may be excluded there, so the founder checks the state's date for that year.
Different for you?
- You moved, or may move, before the sale. Residence dates and option sourcing decide which row applies: moving to another state before selling startup shares.
- You live in California. The rate, estimated payments and form lines are in state tax on QSBS gains.
- You are not sure the shares qualify, or acquired them before July 4, 2025. See QSBS for founders and early employees.
- The company is being acquired for cash and buyer stock, or in a merger or asset sale. See taxes when your startup is acquired.
- You are selling before the holding period ends and want to defer. See rolling over QSBS gain into new startup shares.
- Your state is in the "not confirmed" or "follows only in part" rows, the gain is large, or a move and a sale fall in the same year. These cases turn on the current statute and your dates, and a filed return is hard to unwind. The startups service page covers state review before a sale.
Figures on this page
| Figure | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Hawaii share of qualified small business stock gain generally excluded HRS 235-2.45(e), as amended by Act 35 (2026) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, makes IRC 1202 operative in its form as of December 31, 2024, except 1202(a)(3) and (a)(4), leaving the base percentage in 1202(a)(1); empowerment-zone stock may differ | 50% Tax year 2026 | Hawaii Legislature: HB 2329 CD1 (2026), enacted as Act 35 Checked |
| Massachusetts income exclusion for qualified small business stock gain (stock held more than 5 years) Massachusetts follows section 1202 as the code stood on January 1, 2024 (M.G.L. c. 62, section 1(c)): a 5-year hold, no 2025 tiers. The state's budget pages give older conformity years and a 50% share, which the Commission report does not support | 100% | Massachusetts Tax Expenditure Review Commission: 2026 report Checked |
| Massachusetts reduced rate on certain small business stock gain Part C income from stock of a Massachusetts-domiciled corporation meeting the asset, qualification and 3-year holding conditions of M.G.L. c. 62, section 4(c); the Commission report says it reaches S corporation stock the federal exclusion does not | 3% | Massachusetts General Laws chapter 62, section 4 Checked |
| Washington new individual income tax rate Applies from January 1, 2028 to individuals and married couples filing jointly with annual adjusted gross income over the threshold (Senate Bill 6346) | 9.9% Tax year 2028 | Washington Department of Revenue: Income tax FAQ Checked |
| Washington new individual income tax adjusted gross income threshold Annual adjusted gross income exceeding this amount; the department says how income is calculated will be published later | $1,000,000 Tax year 2028 | Washington Department of Revenue: Income tax FAQ Checked |
| Washington new income tax start date First return due the following year | January 1, 2028 | Washington Department of Revenue: Income tax Checked |
Primary sources
- Public Law 119-21, section 70431
- California FTB: 2025 Instructions for Schedule D (540)
- California FTB: 2025 Instructions for Schedule CA (540)
- California FTB: Publication 1031, Guidelines for Determining Resident Status (2025)
- Pennsylvania Department of Revenue: Personal Income Tax Guide, Net Gains (Losses)
- Oregon Legislature: SB 1507 (2026), enrolled
- Oregon Department of Revenue: 2026 summary of legislation
- Oregon Secretary of State: Upcoming elections
- Illinois General Assembly: Public Act 104-0468
- Vermont Legislature: 32 V.S.A. section 5811
- Vermont Legislature: 32 V.S.A. section 5824
- Maine Legislature: 36 M.R.S. section 5122
- Rhode Island Division of Taxation: 2026 summary of legislative changes
- Alabama Department of Revenue: One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act executive summary
- Arkansas Secretary of State: Code of Arkansas Rules, 26 CAR 100-153
- Hawaii Legislature: HB 2329 CD1 (2026)
- Massachusetts Tax Expenditure Review Commission: 2026 report
- Massachusetts General Laws chapter 62, section 1
- Massachusetts General Laws chapter 62, section 4
- Massachusetts Governor's budget, FY25: tax expenditure 1.042
- South Carolina Code of Laws: sections 12-6-40 and 12-6-50
- South Carolina Department of Revenue: Information Letter 26-4 (revised)
- South Carolina Legislature: H. 3368
- Arizona Legislature: A.R.S. 43-105
- Colorado Office of the State Auditor: report 2026-TE5
- Connecticut General Statutes chapter 229
- Delaware Code title 30, chapter 11, subchapter I
- Georgia: H.B. 1199 (2026)
- Idaho Code section 63-3004
- Indiana Code title 6 (2026)
- Iowa Department of Revenue: Conformity with the Internal Revenue Code
- Kansas Revisor: K.S.A. 79-32,109
- Kentucky Revised Statutes 141.010
- Louisiana Revised Statutes 47:293
- Maryland Tax-General section 1-101
- Maryland General Assembly: H.B. 801 (2026) fiscal note
- Michigan Compiled Laws 206.12
- Minnesota Legislature: 2026 Laws chapter 128
- Missouri Revised Statutes 143.121
- Montana Code Annotated 15-30-2101
- Nebraska Revised Statutes 77-2714
- New Jersey Legislature: P.L. 2025, c.67
- New Mexico Legislature: HB 93 (2026), section 7-2-2
- New York Senate: Tax Law section 612
- New York Department of Taxation and Finance: Instructions for Form IT-220
- New York Senate: Bill S8921A
- North Carolina Session Law 2026-31
- North Dakota Century Code chapter 57-38
- Ohio Revised Code section 5701.11
- Oklahoma Statutes title 68
- Utah Code title 59, chapter 10
- Virginia Code section 58.1-301
- West Virginia Code 11-21-9
- Wisconsin Statutes 71.98
- Mississippi Department of Revenue: 2025 Form 80-100 instructions
- Public Law 119-78 (disapproval of D.C. Act 26-217)
- D.C. Council: D.C. Act 26-416
- D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue: 2025 D-40 booklet
- New Hampshire RSA chapter 77
- Alaska Department of Revenue: Personal income tax
- Florida Department of Revenue: Do I have to file a personal income tax return in Florida?
- Nevada Department of Taxation: Income tax in Nevada
- South Dakota Department of Revenue: Taxes
- Tennessee Department of Revenue: Hall income tax
- Texas Constitution, Article VIII (Texas Legislative Council)
- Wyoming Legislature: Wyoming tax structure, rates and collections (June 2025)
- Washington Department of Revenue: Capital gains tax FAQ
- Washington Department of Revenue: Income tax FAQ
About this guide
Published by Cloud Accounting under standing professional approval. This version has no separately recorded personal review. It explains general rules for the tax year shown. It is not advice for your situation.
Changes
- : First published.